IT Strategy Article
Home > Editor's Choice

Demystifying Project Portfolio Management (PPM)

Monday, March 24, 2008 - CioIndex

Introduction

Project Portfolio Management (PPM) and Project Portfolio Rationalization are terms that have been much abused. Like any other flavor of the month, these buzzwords are on the lips of everyone who is anyone in IT. Unfortunately, like any other buzzword, they are used more than they are understood.

This series of articles is designed to help you understand this extremely important concept and tool for IT Management.

A Brief History of IT: IT as a Cost

Before we dive into the definition and frameworks for PPM, we need to understand some underlying concepts. These concepts are best understood in the historical context that they developed in.

For the longest time information technology was treated as a cost. You “buy” computers. You “buy” applications. You have IT Payroll. Etc. In other words, one “pays a price” for IT – with little or no thought on why that cost is being uncured or what is the benefit other than “we need computers” or “we need reports”.

Looking cool or keeping up with the Joneses was the order of the day for the first 2-3 decades of IT. Yes, there was a time when just having a computer made you look cool and who does not want to look cool! Companies also bought computers because “my competitor has a computer so I must also have one” was the motivating factor.

There is nothing unusual about the path organizations took to adopt computers because that is the usual path for the adoption of any innovation. The cool kids buy an innovation first. Then their pals follow. The masses are the last to jump on the bandwagon. But we digress…

So, why did this sheep mentality continue? In other words, why did people continue to treat IT as a cost?

For one, the adoption of an innovation takes time as we discussed earlier. But a more powerful reason is that this thinking did not hurt anyone. Everyone was treating IT as a cost and hence no one was relatively worse off than the others i.e. there was competitive parity. In the absence of a clear competitive differentiation – advantage or disadvantage – there is little incentive for change.

Then, the impact of this thinking was not felt in another important area – the pocketbook. IT was still not ingrained in every aspect of business operations. Consequently, IT spending was low and hence so was the attention it grabbed within the organization. IT was not on anyone’s radar as a major imperative or focus of attention.

 

[1] 2 3 Next »


Administrator :

webmaster@CioIndex.com
Other Articles »

Related Articles :


 

Feedback


Live Events

On Demand Training
Search:


  Newsletter Signup
Sign Up for ThoughtLeader
Fresh ideas delivered to your inbox. Daily.
Cio Career
Enterprise Architecture
e-Strategy
IT Governance
IT Strategy
Events
E-mail Address :
Manage Subscriptions



Search Articles :


�2006 CioIndex
[Home | A.I.M.I.T | Faq | Privacy | Rss | Contact Us]
Send mail to Webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.