A comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks


This paper provides a framework to compare key enterprise architecture frameworks - Zachman enterprise architecture framework aka Zachman, Department of defense architecture framework aka DoDAF, Treasury enterprise architecture framework aka TEAF and, Federal enterprise architecture framework aka FEAF.

This paper provides a framework to compare key enterprise architecture frameworks - Zachman enterprise architecture framework aka Zachman, Department of defense architecture framework aka DoDAF, Treasury enterprise architecture framework aka TEAF and, Federal enterprise architecture framework aka FEAF.

I have included this paper for a few reasons other than sharing the comparison framework. The first is to highlight the state of discussion on enterprise architecture - enterprise architects are still stuck in the technology weeds - and the resulting lack of connection with business leadership. One cannot make a business case for enterprise architecture - or anything else for that matter - if we do not connect with the business aspects of it.

Take for example the definition of enterprise architecture presented in this paper: "An Enterprise Architecture Framework (EAF) maps all of the software development processes within the enterprise and how they relate and interact to fulfill the enterprise’s mission." Really?

The good news is that we are trying to make a connection to the enterprise's mission. However, is the essence of an enterprise architecture framework the mapping of software development processes? Sure, it is one of the activities but is the architecture of a house - I know there is a debate on the use of this analogy but I am trying to make a point - the mapping of all the brick, door etc. making processes?

So it turns out that the bad news is that we lose out business connection with this definition and way of thinking.

Second, I wanted to highlight the futility of comparing enterprise architecture frameworks. Again, one can admire and perhaps express a preference for the architectures of various buildings but can we truly "compare" architectures in a meaningful way? I don't believe so.

Third, the completely academic nature of these discussions - I could've said juvenile in a "my architecture is better than yours" way but I didn't go there for a reason. Enterprise architects and technology geeks like me love these kinds of discussions – sometimes it feels like we live for them! - because what meaningful discussion does one hope to make based upon such a comparison? This paper is comparing deliverables and process - does that really tell us which framework to adopt?

Download (please login and scroll down)

Download Document: Documents are in common file formats such as Microsoft Word (doc), Powerpoint (ppt), Excel (xls,csv,xlsx), and Adobe pdf.
Download


Related Categories




Related Topics



Related Articles


  • A Brief History of Software Architecture
  • A Framework for Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Comparison and Selection
  • A Review of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
  • An Overview of Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)
  • Architecture and the Integrated Architecture Framework (IAF)
  • C4ISR Architecture Framework Evolution
  • C4ISR Architecture Framework Version 2.0
  • Case Study - Selecting an Enterprise Architecture Framework
  • Common Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
  • Comparison of Enterprise Business Architecture Frameworks
  • Enterprise Architecture (EA) Frameworks
  • Enterprise Architecture for Organizational Transformation
  • Enterprise Architecture Reference Models: A Shared Vision for Service-Oriented Architectures
  • Enterprise Architecture Tool Selection Guide V5.0
  • Evaluation and Selection of Top Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
  • Extended Enterprise Architecture Framework (E2AF)
  • Extended Enterprise Architecture Framework (E2AF)
  • FEA Reference Models Overview 2.2
  • Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) - Challenges and Changes
  • Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework V1.1
  • Federal Enterprise Architecture Reference Model Maintenance Process
  • Federal Enterprise Architecture Template
  • How is FSAM related to FEA?
  • Integrated Enterprise Architecture Planning Framework
  • Integrating FEA with DoDAF and ITIL
  • Introduction to Business Enterprise Architecture (BEA 7.0)
  • Introduction to Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
  • Introduction to Methodology for Business Transformation (MBT)
  • Introduction to the Zachman Enterprise Architecture Framework V2
  • Introduction to Zachman Framework
  • Overview of the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)
  • SABSA Executive White Paper
  • SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework
  • The Dynamic Enterprise Reference Architecture
  • Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework (TEAF)
  • Unifying Enterprise Architecture Framework
  • Using the Federal Enterprise Architecture for Infrastructure Optimization
  • Why Doesn't the Federal Enterprise Architecture Work?

  • Posted on 06/17/2009 by


    A comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks author sourabhhajela

    sourabhhajela




    Signup For ThoughtLeader









    Subscribe


    CIO Index

    Our Focus is On Your Agenda

    CIO Index is the world's largest professional network for CIOs - of the CIO, for the CIO, by the CIO. 

    Over 75,000 CIOs and other IT Executives use CIO Index to Learn, Network and Share.

     

    Cioindex, Inc.

    • (+1) 800-309-3550
    • Mon - Fri 9:00am - 5:00 pm
    • 375 North Stephanie St., Ste 1411, Henderson, NV 89014